Showing posts with label reserves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reserves. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 December 2022

The Singapore dollar is one of the most actively traded currencies in the world relative to our GDP


It's not as if the size of our reserves is an absolute secret. The size of reserves managed by MAS and Temasek is known and published. It's only the size of reserves under GIC's management that is not fully known. Still, it is not completely a secret.


There is such a thing as economic defence.

In the physical defence of our country, would you make public a full inventory of your weapons and armoury?

Isn't it sad when learned people cannot understand why the full size of our reserves should remain a secret?

I 'blame' the PAP for people's ignorance. I tell you why. The PAP Government has succeeded in protecting Singapore and Singaporeans from the full impact of every crisis thus far, so much so that Singaporeans lack the full experience of a crisis. They think overcoming a crisis is a breeze.

The Asian Financial Crisis of 1997 was a shocker that began in Thailand. The Thai baht was the target of intense speculative attacks just before it collapsed in July 1997. For a while, the Thai government managed to defend the currency. However on 2 July 1997, it announced that it would no longer intervene and would allow the baht to float. The sharp depreciation of the baht against the US dollar began that same day.

This immediately triggered panic among investors, and other regional currencies such as the Philippine peso, Indonesian rupiah and Malaysian ringgit also began to experience selling pressure.

The contagion extended its reach to South Korea, Hong Kong and China and in1998, the crisis had spread to Russia and Brazil as their economies saw a free-fall.

In countries most affected by the crisis, banks and other companies collapsed or had to be rescued, and many others were forced to downsize, resulting in massive unemployment. In Indonesia, the crisis even led to the resignation of then president Suharto.

As a small open economy Singapore is extremely vulnerable to external developments. The large and adverse economic shocks of the Asian financial crisis could potentially have had a devastating effect on the Singapore economy.

Singapore, however, withstood the financial storm lashing the region and the Sing dollar did not come under the kind of pressure that many other currencies faced. Singapore was sheltered. The PAP Government took various measures to keep Singapore competitive.

The result is that Singaporeans including learned Singaporeans are unable to imagine what a speculative attack on the Sing dollar can look like. The only people who fully understood what happened during the AFC were people in government and MAS, civil servants and Heng Swee Keat.

With every successful handling of a crisis, Singaporeans have come to take Singapore's success for granted, so much so 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐞'𝐬 𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝.

In normal times, the Singapore dollar is actively traded with a daily turnover estimated at US$37 billion! This is the volume in normal circumstances. ( US$9.5 trillion annually).

Can you imagine how much firepower you would need if the Sing dollar comes under speculative attack? The financial strength that the government would also need to take other measures as well to maintain investors' confidence so your financial institutions do not collapse? Otherwise, all you learned and rich people may just helplessly watch your own savings all gone in a second.

Saturday, 26 November 2022

We live in a VUCA world



We live in a VUCA world, so we should be careful which political party we elect to form the next government.


"𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐟 𝐰𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐨𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐝𝐥𝐲. 𝐈𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞.
𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐚 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭.

𝐒𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐬.

𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞, 𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞.

𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭 𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐔𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐲, 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐀𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐲 (𝐕𝐔𝐂𝐀), 𝐰𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, able to offer Outstanding Leadership - Be Visionary, Understanding (the complexity and challenges ), Credible, Capable and Capacity to deal with known unknowns and unknown unknowns, and Adaptability." 

Thursday, 24 November 2022

The WP wants more to spend today, less to save for tomorrow

 Like how the recycling of land makes for a fair and just Singapore because every generation of Singaporeans can own their homes, the equal division (50:50) of NIRC to spend on current and future generations is a fair way of taking care of all Singaporeans.


Not less is spend on current Singaporeans. Not more is saved for future generations. 50:50. Fair and equal.



The WP wants more for today. They want more than just 60% to 70% of NIRC. They also want land sale proceeds.

Constitution allows the government to spend up to 50% of NRIC. For the past few years, the Government HAS spent almost 50%.

Let's do some simple math.

For FY2022, the NIRC is $21.6 billion representing approximately 50%.

If $21.6 b is 50%, then 100% is $43.2 b

If we follow WP's suggestion of using 60% of NIRC:

that's equal to $25.92.

On top of this, WP also want direct use of land sale proceeds.

Sales of land for FY2022 is estimated at $11.2 billion.

So (11.2 + 25.92) = $37.12 billion

WP wants to spend $37.12 from NIRC and reserves (land) and leave $17.28 to reinvest for the future.

What if they want 70% of NIRC?

That will be $30.24 billion.
Add land sale of $11.2 billion.
The total they want to spend is $41.44 billion.

And how much of NIRC will be left to reinvest for the future? $12.96 billion.

This is what Leon Perera called 'slowing the growth' of reserves.

Slower growth means smaller returns. It's as simple as that.

You will have to pay higher taxes because you will have less from NIRC. 

Wednesday, 23 November 2022

50:50 division of NIRC takes care of both the present and the future Singaporeans in a fair way.




It is said that without a vision, the people perish. Visionary leaders take care of the present with their eyes on the future as well so that the people can be future-ready.


A 50:50 division of NIRC takes care of both the present and the future Singaporeans in a fair way.

PSP wants a 100% use of NIRC. The WP wants 60%, even 70% use of NIRC.

Today, the NIRC contributes more than $21.6 billion (FY2022) to the budget.

Our forefathers did not spend the NIRC.

𝐒𝐔𝐏𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐄𝐅𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐒 𝐇𝐀𝐃 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐀𝐌𝐄 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐒𝐄𝐓 𝐀𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐏

Suppose because they spent from the NIRC and as a result, today we have 20% less NIRC to spend.

20% of $21.6 billion is $4.32 billion.

The 2% GST hike is intended to raise $3.5 billion.

If our forefathers had the mentality of the WP, today, we will need to raise $7.82 billion instead of $3.5 billion because we have less in NIRC to spend.

The GST hike will have to be more than 2% to achieve $7.82 billion.

You will have to pay a hike of more than 4%.

You will be paying 11% GST or more instead of 9%.

This is what will happen if the WP's proposal to spend more from NIRC is adopted.

Spending more from NIRC means reinvesting less resulting in smaller growth (slow the growth, says Leon Perera) and therefore smaller gains for the future.

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐏 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐚𝐱𝐞𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐝𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐈𝐑𝐂 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦.

𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬? They could be YOU in your twilight years. They are your children, children's children, family. relatives, friends.

𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄 𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐖𝐄 𝐓𝐎𝐃𝐀𝐘?

1. Today, 𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐟 of us working Singaporeans 𝐝𝐨 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐩𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐱.

2. 80% of us who do pay income tax pays 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝟒%.

3. With the Enhanced GST Voucher Scheme, the 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐨𝐦 𝟑𝟎% 𝐨𝐟 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐩𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐧 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐆𝐒𝐓 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝟑%.

4. The 𝐞𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐏𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐒𝐓 𝐡𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝟓 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬 for lower and middle income households.

You will not find another country in the world

- where their citizens pay low-to-no income tax, single digit GST,

- and enjoy the best in the world in terms of housing, education, healthcare, public transport

- a country where the Government puts in effort to provide intensive, holistic help to those from the neediest and vulnerable families (KidsSTART, UPLIFT etc)

- a country where the Government expends great effort to help prison inmates (I know because a friend of mine works in prison school) achieve their potential.

The future will come. It takes political courage to do right not just by the present generation of Singaporeans, but by the future generations as well.

𝐀 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐨 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞. 

Tuesday, 22 November 2022

How much reserves are enough for Singaporeans to feel comfortable with? WP must specify the amount so that they can be held accountable to that amount.




𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡? 𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐭!


The WP says that there is such a thing as oversaving. So we ask them to name a figure for the size of our reserves beyond which we are oversaving.

Based on the size of our economy, the demographic profile of our population and the changing global structure, name the size of our reserves that Singaporeans can be comfortable with, go to sleep at night with the confidence that come what may, we have the firepower to deal with it.

Don't speak in general, alluring terms. Tell us how much is enough.

Don't tell us you don't know because if you don't know how much is enough, if you can't put your finger to a figure, what is your basis for saying we are oversaving? Are you gambling with our children's lives and future?

The opposition and their friends have been throwing up a lot of figures, so we have only a simple request : how much is enough?

Name it!

Sunday, 20 November 2022

What's the difference between the Government's approach to using land sale proceeds and the WP's proposal?




Someone asks: what's the difference between the Government's approach to using land sale proceeds and the WP's proposal?


If you spend from your wealth, you will deplete your wealth. This is easy to understand.

Hence you need to create new wealth (new income) before you spend so that you do not deplete your wealth.

When you sell an asset (land) you are not creating new wealth. You are just converting a physical asset into a financial asset.

The asset goes to someone else and you get the money.

If you spend the money, then both the asset and the money is gone.

You now have fewer assets to invest and generate income. This means your power to generate new wealth is reduced.

Your remaining assets will generate a smaller new income.

If you keep selling your assets, very soon you will have little to generate new income or wealth.

What is just described is what the WP's proposal will do.

The PAP Government's approach is to put land sale proceeds together with Past Reserves and reinvest them.

The land goes to someone else. The financial proceeds remain and are reinvested. This creates new wealth.

50% of the (new wealth) investment returns under the NIR Framework are then used as government revenue for spending.

In this way, land sale proceeds are being used to generate a continual stream of income for sustainable spending.

The man who works hard to accumulate wealth knows that wealth creation is not easy. He looks at the wealth he has and ask: how can I use this wealth to generate a continual stream of income for sustainable spending?

The impatient man who comes into an inheritance, looks at the wealth and says: wow, I'm so rich. I can now relax and enjoy.

Monday, 1 March 2021

PSP Leong Mun Wai: spend every cent of NIRC returns


 

Mr Leong represents PSP's position. It is shocking to hear him suggest using 100% of NIRC.


Spend every cent of investment returns. Can someone help him to understand the consequences?

Friday, 26 February 2021

According to economist Jamus Lim of WP, currency speculation can be stabilising for an economy.



Well, what do we know? According to economist Jamus Lim of WP, currency speculation can be stabilising for an economy.

Try telling that to countries that were deeply hurt by the Asian Financial Crisis.
So what would it be like to have a WP Government based on what they have said in Parliament so far?
Workers will be earning just the minimum wages.
Carbon tax will be raised by 25 times its current rate with costs filtering down to every household.
Popular schools will see their funding cut to make them less popular with students.
Non-violent criminal records will be expunged.
State land will be sold for revenue to spend.
The full size of the Singapore reserves will be revealed to the world and currency speculation encouraged to help stabilise the Singapore currency.

Thursday, 24 December 2020

Listen to Prudence


 

When times are good, we save money - because it is in good times that we have the ability to save money.

When we fall on hard times, we rely on the savings stored up in good times.
So don't listen to the populist politician who says to you in good times: Come on, we can spend more from our savings. We have so much.
Listen to Prudence. Prudence is never shortsighted. Prudence thinks and plans for the future. Prudence is never populist.
Without natural resources to sell for revenue, Singapore has only our reserves to fall back on.
A well-managed country has enabled Singapore to make decisive decisions with boldness and confidence. Thanks to Good Government.

Friday, 4 September 2020

𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬: 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐬. 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲.



Recently it was reported in the news that there were Singaporeans in financial difficulties due to COVID-19. These were not the average earners. They are high earners who had not managed their funds well. Just as an individual must live within his means, so too must a family and a country.

In his speech in Parliament on 2 September, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong emphasized the need to live within our means and to save for rainy days.

He said:

As a matter of principle, our social safety nets should be paid for out of current revenues. 𝐖𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐰 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝, 𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧.

When our founding generation were building up our reserves, they never asked themselves whether they had too much savings.

We were in our early days of nationhood. Things were so uncertain, and no one knew what the next day would bring.

Compared to today, incomes then were low but it was never a question of how much reserves would be enough.

The question was whether we could steadily squirrel away a bit more in our reserves, year after year, decade after decade, as protection for a rainy day.

After several generations of frugal prudence, we have built up significant reserves and 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲, 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐚𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞 in this enormous monster storm.

We have been able to draw on past reserves and fund our essential Budget packages and help people on a very big scale.

𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬: 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐬. 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲.

𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐬: 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞 𝐡𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐮𝐜𝐡 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬, 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐈 𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐈 𝐬𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐁𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐬. 𝐋𝐞𝐭 𝐮𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲.

This was not the attitude of our forefathers, the founders who are building for the future.

But the 𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐧𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐮𝐧𝐞, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫𝐬’ 𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬.'

This is fundamentally the wrong approach.

How much reserves are enough, or too much? There can be no good answer to this question.

Monday, 3 August 2020

When can you save for rainy days? Not when the rainy day is here.



When can you save for rainy days? Not when the rainy day is here.
You save when times are good. You can never save enough because you don't know how long a rainy day can last.
When times are good, it is tempting to dip into the coffers and enjoy. But it is unwise.
Think of the future and your children's future. We must always be able to focus our eyes on the present while also keeping them on the horizon.
Populism will lead you down the road to ruin. As the saying goes, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.