Instead of assuring his resident that help is available, WP Jamus Lim chose to echo his resident and to perpetuate the misconception that they have nowhere to turn to.
When Dr Tan See Leng offered to do a job match for the resident, he learned from Jamus that actually, the resident had already found a job.
Why did Jamus choose to highlight the resident's difficulty looking for a job while suppressing the fact that actually, in spite of difficulties, the resident had found a job?
When Dr Tan See Leng offered to do a job match for the resident, he learned from Jamus that actually, the resident had already found a job.
Why did Jamus choose to highlight the resident's difficulty looking for a job while suppressing the fact that actually, in spite of difficulties, the resident had found a job?
Suppressing a part of the story allows false impressions to be formed and generates negativity against the government. Sad, isn't, it?
MPs have the responsibility to assure residents that help is available and to explain policies that they already agreed with. They should not become a mindless echo chamber. In the Jamus' case, the WP had, in Parliament, AGREED on the need for complementary talent.
No comments:
Post a Comment