First Raeesah Khan, then Workers' Party lied to the whole nation

First Raeesah lied to the entire nation.

Then the WP Leadership also told 'untruths' to the entire nation to cover up their role in the persistence of the lies.

They had told Raeesah to continue with the narrative she had given to Parliament and that if Ms Khan and WP can get away with it, there was no need to clarify the lie. She was asked to 'take the information to the grave'.

One lie after another.

Incoherent or inconsistent Workers' Party ?

WP MPs will each sing a different tune to a different audience and hope that in this way, they will be able to win votes from every quarter.

The end result is a broken tune except that you do not realise it because they are careful not to sing a disharmonious tune at the same time.

For example, when Faisal expressed his stand against LGBT, the rest of the party is strangely silent.

Similarly, when Raeesah expressed her support for LGBT, you think Faisal will speak?

What is WP's official position? Will the conductor of the song, namely the Leader of WP state their party's position and not take supporters for a ride?

Wake up, Workers' Party. Don't just read The Hammer.

Wake up, Workers' Party. Don't just read The Hammer.

Raeesah asked for the formation of a committee that is already formed.

Louis asked the government not to keep people unaware but to provide details of Phase 3 reopening when the taskforce had already said more than a week ago that details would be announced.

The best is from Jamus Lim. Not knowing that Minimum Wage Plus is actually Progressive Wage Model, he declared a shift in PAP's stand which he attributed to the election and claimed credit for it.

The Workers' Party must also keep the promises they made during the election and not keep quiet and hope that with time, voters will forget about them.

Will Pritam Singh keep his promise to review Raeesah Khan's social media posts?

 

When the PAP makes a promise, they are held by voters to the promise they make.

What about the opposition? When they make a promise, are they held to their promise?

Is the Leader of the Opposition,

Pritam Singh

going to keep his promise to conduct a review of Raeesah Khan's post? Or is he hoping that by keeping quiet and by hiding comments, supporters will forget that he had made a promise?

Promises made during an election are meant to be kept after the election.

Stern warning for Raeesah Khan the offence of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race

Stern warning for the offence of promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion or race.

Let's hope that she will toe her party line of being 'race-blind' and cease from ever making comments that touch on racism or promote enmity between different groups.

That said, there is no place for racism in Singapore, regardless of one's position.

𝐖𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐰𝐞 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐦𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐢𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞.

𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐰𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐮𝐩 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐰𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬.

"She allegedly commented that Singapore law enforcement authorities discriminated against citizens, and that compared to other groups, rich Chinese and white people were treated differently under the law," said SPF in a statement on Jul 5.

"In the context of a news article on the City Harvest Church ruling, Raeesah Khan allegedly commented that Singapore jailed minorities mercilessly, harassed mosque leaders but let corrupt church leaders who stole S$50 million walk free, and questioned who had been paid."

We know this isn't true as the leaders were jailed.